Legal Opinion

Cusano v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiff made application to the liquor control commission for a package store liquor permit which was denied on the ground that the number of like outlets in the vicinity made the granting of another permit detrimental to the public interest. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, which sustained the action of the commission. From that judgment he has appealed to this court. It is his claim that the commission acted arbitrarily, capriciously and illegally in denying his application. The procedure on this appeal was not entirely regular, but no point was made of this and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Holley v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Wadell v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. Council of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Town of Greenwich v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Dubitzky v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Boncal v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API