Folmer Graflex Corp. v. Graphic Photo Service
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
There are before me two motions: (1) To strike the fourth defense set up in the defendants’ answer as immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous, and (2) a motion to strike the action from the jury list. The second motion raises the question of the defendants’ right to a trial by jury.
The action involves an alleged infringement of the plaintiff’s trade-mark, and seeks an injunction against the defendants and an accounting of their profits. This action is in the nature of an old action in equity, and, as such, is triable before a court without a jury. See National Labor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Delaware, L. & W. R. v. FrankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
- Vitagraph, Inc. v. GrobaskiDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tempo Music, Inc., Robbins Music Corporation, Remick Music Corporation, and Mills Music, Inc. v. James D. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Shaffer v. Coty, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1960
- McCullough v. Dairy Queen, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961