Legal Opinion
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1969No. 62 Civ. 850PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Decision with Respect to Antitrust Misuse Defense
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
On November 7, 1968, the Court filed its decision and findings of fact with respect to plaintiffs’ claims against defendants in the above-entitled action, holding that the plaintiff Carl Zeiss Stiftung has the sole and exclusive right to the use of the Zeiss name and trademarks in dispute and that plaintiff Zeiss Ikon A. G. has the sole and exclusive right to use the Zeiss Ikon name and mark, D.C., 293 F.Supp. 892. The Court further held that defendant V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. and Ercona…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Ever-Ready Incorporated, a Corporation, and Mark Gilbert, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss JenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Osawa & Co. v. B & H PHOTODistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- The Clorox Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Sterling Winthrop, Inc. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.