Legal Opinion
Vitagraph, Inc. v. Grobaski
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 13, 1931No. 543, 542, 541PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
• These are copyright infringement suits, the relief sought being injunctions and damages pursuant to the copyright laws of the United States. The claim in general in each suit is that defendants, who were licensed to exhibit various copyrighted motion pictures on specified dates, used the same beyond the license period without permission. Subsequent to the filing of answers, decisions of the United States Supreme Court in the cases of United States v. First National Pictures, Inc., et al., 51 S. Ct. 45, 75 L. Ed.- and Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. et al. v. United…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Forstmann Woolen Co. v. Murray Sices Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- United Artists Associated, Inc. v. NWL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.