Legal Opinion
In Re Carlson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 2002No. 01-BG-994PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended the disbarment of respondent Diane E. Cafferty, who practiced law with Glenn H. Carlson as Carlson & Cafferty. The Board found that Mr. Carlson engaged in intentional misappropriation and other violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (“the Rules”); he filed no exception to the Board’s Report. 1 The Board recommended that Diane E. Cafferty be disbarred for conduct amounting to reckless misappropriation and failure to render ac-countings promptly to clients upon request, but not for failure to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re WillinghamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CaffertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.