Legal Opinion
In re Willingham
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 2006No. 05-BG-44PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Per curiam
In this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding against respondent N. Jerome Willingham, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) has recommended that the identical discipline of disbarment be imposed. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has opposed this recommendation.
The respondent was disbarred by the Disciplinary Hearing Commission of the North Carolina State Bar on October 21, 2004, following a series of charged ethical violations in that state, including: engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation by misappropriating the funds of three clients;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re WillinghamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by63 opinions
- In Re DigiovanniDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re DuncanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re DetlefsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re ElmendorfDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.