Legal Opinion
In Re Bailey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 15, 2005No. 03-BG-171PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
A majority of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that Samuel Bailey, Jr. be suspended from the practice of law for nine months and be required to complete a course in ethics and a course in trust accounting as a condition of reinstatement, due to his violation of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Responsibility. The Board found that Mr. Bailey had commingled funds,1 failed to maintain complete trust account records,2 failed to notify a physician of a client’s settlement,3 and entered into an impermissible business *109transacti…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bode & Grenier, LLP v. Carroll KnightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Washington Convention Center Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.