Legal Opinion

Welch v. Sun Underwriters Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

The plaintiff, I. M. Welch, has not appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict at the trial of this action in the Superior Court. The jury found, in accordance with all the evidence, and under the instructions to which there were no exceptions, that he is not entitled to recover upon the policy on which this action was brought. Judgment was rendered accordingly that he recover nothing of the -defendant in this action. All the evidence tended to show that after the issuance of the policy and before the fire which destroyed the property insured thereby, the said plaintiff violated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Roper v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Smith v. National Ben Franklin Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Everhart v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Peeler v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Burton v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API