Legal Opinion

Burton v. Life & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BrogdeN, J.(1) Can an illiterate insured, receiving certain written policies of insurance not covering his injury, recover benefits falsely and fraudulently represented to be contained in the policies, without reforming the contracts?(2) Can such contracts be reformed by a mere showing of fraud and Avithout any allegation or issue warranting reformation and without a prayer for such relief ?

Justice Holce, delivering the opinion in Flours v. Insurance Co., 144 N. C., 232, 56 S. E., 915, wrote: “It is also accepted doctrine that when the parties have bargained together touching a contract of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Britton v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ricks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Sykes v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Britton v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Hunter v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Textile Insurance v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Williams v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API