Legal Opinion
Peeler v. United States Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 29, 1929PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The defendant issued its policy insuring E. K. Grabara as respects legal liability arising or resulting from any claim made upon bim for damages in consequence of an accident occurring by reason of bis ownership, maintenance, or use of an automobile. the policy contains the following provisions:
“Item 3. the company will defend, in the name and on behalf of the assured, all claims or suits for damages for which the assured is alleged to be legally liable and will pay within the limits covered by this policy, any final judgment rendered against said assured for damages, together with the taxed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Phoenix Cotton Oil Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Foster v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Jefferson Realty Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. C. G. Tate Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.