McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Without going into the “mix-up,” as indicated by the third issue, whereby the insured was confused with his 36-year-old son in the application, suffice it to say the policy in suit contains the following provision:
“20. Age Limits of Policy: The insurance under this policy shall not cover any person under the age of 18 years nor over the age of 65 years. Any premium paid to the company for any period not covered by this policy will be returned upon request.”
With this provision in the face of the policy, plaintiff’s recovery is limited to a return of the premiums paid while the insured was over…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Horton v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Burton v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- López Castro v. Atlantic Southern InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
- Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hunter v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- American Home Mutual Life Insurance v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Allen v. National Accident & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.