Smith v. National Ben Franklin Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The policy of insurance in controversy contained, in accordance with statutory requirement, tbe usual clauses rendering tbe policy void if tbe interest of tbe insured should be other than unconditional and sole ownership or of sale of tbe property by reason of any mortgage or deed of trust. In order to obviate tbe legal effect of these clauses tbe plaintiff relies upon tbe doctrine of waiver. This contention rests upon tbe fact that a short time prior to tbe fire, and long after tbe policy bad been issued, tbe plaintiff bad notified tbe agent of tbe defendant of tbe existence of tbe Parker…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Rhode Island InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Hayes v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Hardin v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Bullard v. Pilot Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Aldridge v. Greensboro Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Greene v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Zibelin v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.