Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
The first appeal raises these questions:
1. Is the plaintiff Gosnell, the insured and mortgagor, bound by the award of the appraisers ?
2. Is the plaintiff Green, the mortgagee, bound by it?
In deciding these questions, we must assume that the allegations of fact in the complaint are true. This is so because the judgment was entered on tbe pleadings pursuant to tbe motion of tbe defendant. Raleigh v. Fisher, 232 N.C. 629, 61 S.E. 2d 897.
Tbe complaint alleges these things concerning tbe award: That Gos-nell, tbe insured and mortgagor, and tbe insurance company were not able to agree upon tbe…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Chandos v. American Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Officer v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Collinsville Savings Society v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Bowen v. Hodge Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Shores v. RabonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Bentley v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.