Legal Opinion

Application of Ferguson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1993No. 16073PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KLEIN, J.

This appeal stems from an order issued by the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit dismissing with prejudice appellant’s petition for quo warranto. The petition had challenged per diem judge Douglas Ige to show by what authority he held his appointed office.

I. FACTS

David Ferguson (appellant) filed a petition for quo warranto alleging that per diem judge Douglas Ige’s (appellee) private law practice contravened article VI, section 3 of the Hawaii Constitution. Appellant recognized that Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 604 — 2 (1985) 1 specifically allows per diem…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. KantnerHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  4. STATE Ex Rel MADDEN v. CRAWFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Filipino Federation of America, Inc. v. CubicoHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dejetley v. Kaho'ohalahalaHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Dembowski v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  5. Ford v. Leithead-ToddHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API