Legal Opinion

Dejetley v. Kaho'ohalahala

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2010No. 29919PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that 1) the plain language and construction of § 3-3 of the Charter of the County of Maui (CCM) requires a mandatory and immediate forfeiture of office should a council member violate the § 3-3 residency requirement and that such forfeiture automatically results in an immediate vacancy of that office; 2) impeachment under § 13-13 of the CCM and recall under § 12-1, et seq. of the CCM are not remedies for a violation of § 3-3, as those provisions cannot effect the immediacy and vacancy requirements of § 3-3; 3) declaratory judgment may be a possible…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Haynes v. OttleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. v. MatayoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. Pali.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Willis v. SwainHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Sierra Club v. Castle & Cooke Homes Hawai'i, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API