Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2005No. 26517PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The Disciplinary Board (the Board) filed a report and recommendation to suspend Respondent Ronald G.S. Au (Au) from the practice of law for a period of two years. The Board bases its report and recommendation on a hearing committee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

We accept the hearing committee’s find7 ings of fact and conclusions of law. For the reasons set forth below, however, we suspend Au from the practice of law for a period of five years. A separate suspension order is entei’ed with this opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The ODC’s Petition for Discipline

On November 14, 2000, Petitioner…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McCuin v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re CheronisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Schurz Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Rustin Smith v. City & County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Chen v. HoeflingerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. In Re BrandonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In Re the Estate of DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API