State v. Kam
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HAYASHI, J.
Defendants-Appellants Brian Kam and Deborah Cohen (collectively “Appellants") appeal their convictions for promoting pornographic adult magazines under Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereinafter “HRS") § 712-1214(l)(a) (1985). At trial, Appellants had presented experts plus public opinion surveys to prove that the magazines were not obscene, but Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii (hereinafter “State") had introduced only the magazines to show that the explicit sexual content was pornographic. Appellants contend that 1) HRS § 712-1214(l)(a) A) is unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. DowningOhio Supreme Court · 1989
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.