Legal Opinion

State v. Kam

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1988No. 11861, 11949PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

Defendants-Appellants Brian Kam and Deborah Cohen (collectively “Appellants") appeal their convictions for promoting pornographic adult magazines under Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereinafter “HRS") § 712-1214(l)(a) (1985). At trial, Appellants had presented experts plus public opinion surveys to prove that the magazines were not obscene, but Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii (hereinafter “State") had introduced only the magazines to show that the explicit sexual content was pornographic. Appellants contend that 1) HRS § 712-1214(l)(a) A) is unconstitutionally…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. DowningOhio Supreme Court · 1989

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API