Legal Opinion

In Re D'Onofrio

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 2001No. 99-BG-1207PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 11, 1998, Frank T. D’Onofrio, Jr., was suspended from the practice of law in New York for a period of two years. In re D’Onofrio, 242 A.D.2d 31, 672 N.Y.S.2d 889 (App. Div. 1998) (per curiam) (D’Onofrio I)- The court conditioned reinstatement on proof that D’Onofrio has fully complied with the terms of his suspension and that he “has otherwise properly conducted himself.” Id. at 890-91. The relevant facts are set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Division in D’Onofrio I, and we need not recite them here.

Following the imposition of discipline in New York, D’Onofrio reported his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In re D'OnofrioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In Re StuartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In Re AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In Re BrannonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In Re StuartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API