Legal Opinion
In Re Brannon
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 2010No. 09-BG-1243Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On further consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the South Carolina Supreme Court suspending respondent for one year, see In the Matter of Derwin Brannon, 383 S.C. 374, 680 S.E.2d 776 (2009), the requirement that South Carolina attorneys suspended for nine months or more must file a petition for reinstatement, this court’s November 2, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and there appearing to be no response from…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re MeislerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re D'OnofrioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re BrannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- In re AyeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007