Legal Opinion
In Re Stuart
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 2008No. 06-BG-378PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
In this reciprocal discipline case, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that Claude N. Stuart, a member of our bar, be suspended for three years, the identical sanction imposed by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court. The Board also recommends that respondent be subject to a fitness requirement as a condition of reinstatement. Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has excepted to these recommendations, which we adopt.
In May 2002, respondent, who was an Assistant District Attorney in Queens County, New York, failed to produce to the defense a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bradley v. NicholsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re WingerterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re Sherryl V.R.S. Goffer a/k/a Sherryl Snodgrass CaffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re FlynnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.