Price v. Eastham

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Price v. Eastham (Price 1), we held that a public prescriptive easement had been established and remanded the case to the superior court for a determination of the easement's scope. 1 In Price I, we discussed the question of seope in some detail, remarking that "[clourts have restricted the seope of prescriptive easements significantly to limit the burden on the servient estate" 2 and suggesting that the superior court was "free to impose restrictions upon the easement consistent with the Restatement (Third) [of Property: Servitudes] ... including ...…