Legal Opinion

Timothy W. v. Julia M.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2017No. 7196 S-16222PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The father in a custody, support, and visitation dispute maintains that the trial court was biased against him. The father challenges- the court’s: (1) denial' of his judicial recusal motion; (2) decision to keep certain hearings open to the public; (3) sua sponte admission of evidence during its oral decision on the record; and (4) findings that the father had a history, of domestic violence agains.t a “domestic living partner” requiring the court to impose limitations on his visitation. We affirm the trial court as to the first three matters, but we…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In the Matter of Union Leader CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  4. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SharpeAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Tomal v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Creekside Limited Partnership, Creekside-Alyeska, LLC, and Community Development, Inc. v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Taryn M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API