Timothy W. v. Julia M.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The father in a custody, support, and visitation dispute maintains that the trial court was biased against him. The father challenges- the court’s: (1) denial' of his judicial recusal motion; (2) decision to keep certain hearings open to the public; (3) sua sponte admission of evidence during its oral decision on the record; and (4) findings that the father had a history, of domestic violence agains.t a “domestic living partner” requiring the court to impose limitations on his visitation. We affirm the trial court as to the first three matters, but we…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- In the Matter of Union Leader CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SharpeAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Tomal v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Creekside Limited Partnership, Creekside-Alyeska, LLC, and Community Development, Inc. v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Taryn M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.