Legal Opinion
Andersen v. Edwards
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1981No. 4586PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
Wrangell Mountain Enterprises [hereinafter Wrangell] appeals a jury verdict against it for wrongfully cutting trees beyond the amount reasonably necessary to construct a roadway within a state reserved section line easement. Numerous points are raised on appeal, several of which we find meritorious. Consequently, we reverse the judgment.
In May, 1975, Wrangell, a development partnership, acquired property in the vicinity of McCarthy, Alaska, adjacent to property owned by appellees [hereinafter the Edwardses]. Included in the development plans was the construction of a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- King-Porter Company v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Alban v. R. K. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Rivan Die Mold Corp. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Makino, U.S.A., Inc. v. Metlife Capital Credit Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Seaward Const. Co., Inc. v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Carpenter v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Osborne v. HurstAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.