Legal Opinion
Breck v. Ulmer
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1987No. S-1615PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION.
This appeal arises from the second action filed by Betty Breck in connection with the City and Borough of Juneau’s (CBJ) decision to seek “design-build” proposals for the construction of a parking garage and marine park adjacent to the downtown Juneau waterfront. See City and Borough of Juneau v. Breck (Breck I), 706 P.2d 313 (Alaska 1985). The principal issues herein are whether the superior court erred in granting the CBJ mayor and assembly members’ motion for summary judgment based on their claimed immunity from suit, and whether the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Sopko v. Dowell Schlumberger, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.