Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Enright
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to enforce the liability of the defendant Commercial and Savings Bank and others as stockholders in the Shasta Lumber Company. All the defendants, except appellant, paid their proportionate shares of the debt before the trial, and as to them the action was dismissed. Defendants pleaded the statute of limitations. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order denying motion for new trial this appeal is prosecuted.
Appellant states in its brief that the only question arising on the appeal involves its plea of the statute of limitations, except a question, also raised, as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- VIDAL v. Girard's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Sharon S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.