Legal Opinion

Rudd v. Byrnes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1909No. S.F. No. 4957PublishedCited by 42 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff, having been wounded by a bullet fired from defendant’s rifle, brought this action to recover damages, alleging that his injuries were due to defendant’s negligence. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for five hundred dollars. The defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action was commenced in December, 1906, about fourteen months after the shooting. The defendant filed an answer, in which he denied the allegations of the complaint, and affirmatively pleaded facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Morgan v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Wright v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
  5. Bahel v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Jensen v. MinardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Grodsky v. Consolidated Bag Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API