Legal Opinion
Shadburne v. Daly
California Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1888No. 11364PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This action was brought against the defendant as drawer of an order of which the following is a copy:—
“$315. San Francisco, August 8,1885.
“William Younger: Please pay William A. Plunkett, or order, the sum $315, and charge the same to my account. “Annie E. Daly.”
This order was on the 10th of August, 1885, indorsed by Plunkett to plaintiff.
The order was presented to Younger, who refused to accept it, of which defendant was duly notified.
The point is made by the respondent that the bill of exceptions contains “no specification of particulars,” and should, therefore, be disregarded. We find no…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Beeson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.