County of Siskiyou v. Gamlich
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action for the condemnation of a right of way for a public highway over the lands of defendant. The complaint alleges that the required petition in writing for laying out a new road, signed by at least ten freeholders of the road district in which defendant’s lands are situated and taxable therein for road purposes, was presented to the board of supervisors; that the necessary accompanying bond was filed and approved by the board; that three viewers were appointed, one of whom was the county surveyor, and that two of the viewers proceeded to view, survey, and lay out…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Humboldt Cty. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Damrell v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Los Angeles County v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by19 opinions
- County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Bank of Woodland v. HeronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.