Legal Opinion

City of Middleburg Heights v. Quinones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2008No. 2007-1863PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The city of Middleburg Heights appeals from a decision of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, which concluded, “[C]ourt costs should be assessed for each case and not for each offense.” Middleburg Hts. v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 88242, 2007-Ohio-3643, 2007 WL 2051994, at ¶97. We accepted jurisdiction over a narrow issue: whether court costs assessed by municipal courts are to be imposed on a per case or per charge basis. After review, we observe that R.C. 2947.23(A)(1) specifies that in all criminal cases, judges are to include the costs of prosecution in the sentence and render a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cave v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. PerzOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. City of Middleburg Hts. v. Quinones, 88242 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. CroomOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. RizerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. Braden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API