City of Middleburg Heights v. Quinones
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The city of Middleburg Heights appeals from a decision of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, which concluded, “[C]ourt costs should be assessed for each case and not for each offense.” Middleburg Hts. v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 88242, 2007-Ohio-3643, 2007 WL 2051994, at ¶97. We accepted jurisdiction over a narrow issue: whether court costs assessed by municipal courts are to be imposed on a per case or per charge basis. After review, we observe that R.C. 2947.23(A)(1) specifies that in all criminal cases, judges are to include the costs of prosecution in the sentence and render a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Cave v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. PerzOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- City of Middleburg Hts. v. Quinones, 88242 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. CroomOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RizerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Braden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.