Legal Opinion

State v. Perz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2007No. L-06-1359PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Osowik, Judge.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court, following a no-contest plea, in which the trial court found appellant, Sally Perz, guilty of one count of knowingly filing a false financial disclosure statement in violation of R.C. 102.02(D), a first-degree misdemeanor. At sentencing, in addition to a fine, the trial court ordered appellant to pay $4,125 as “her proportionate share of the cost of the investigation and prosecution.”

{¶ 2} On appeal, appellant sets forth the following four assignments of error:

{¶ 3} “First Assignment of Error

{¶ 4} “The Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Northwestern Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re SlusserOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. TuttOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. City of Middleburg Heights v. QuinonesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RizerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. LincolnOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Perrysburg v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API