Legal Opinion

Strattman v. Studt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1969No. 69-381PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

With respect to the fine, the questions to be decided are whether Section 2947.20, Revised Code, which permits incarceration for nonpayment, denies an indigent equal protection of the laws; and whether there is an abuse of discretion where a trial court imposes a fine which, in effect, confines an indigent longer than the maximum sentence authorized by the statute or ordinance violated.

In deciding those questions, we must consider the implications our decision will have upon our established systems of penal fines and imprisonment for nonpayment of fines. We must, in addition, remember the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Williams v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. Davis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2012

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API