Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenburg

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2012No. CA2010-03-063PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Powell, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} A Butler County pediatrician convicted of various drug- and sex-related crimes in connection with allegations that he molested three minor patients and provided, for years, money or the means to obtain drugs to two of the same victims now appeals some of his convictions. Mark E. Blankenburg argues that the trial court erred when it refused to divide certain counts of his indictment into separate counts, incorrectly permitted the indictment to be amended at trial, and improperly admitted evidence of other acts that he had committed. We affirm the convictions,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. BirtOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. KinsworthyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. RubleOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API