Legal Opinion

State v. Threatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2006No. Nos. 2004-1279 and 2004-1696PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} This case presents us with the opportunity to address questions that were not presented in State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393. In White, we held that R.C. 2947.23 requires a court to assess costs against all convicted defendants. However, we also held that a court could waive payment of costs assessed against indigent defendants. Id. at ¶ 8, 14. Finally, we held that while R.C. 2949.14 required a clerk of courts to attempt to collect costs from nonindigent defendants, it did not forbid the clerk to attempt to collect costs from indigent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bell v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. KeefeOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 2010

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API