Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Woollacott

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1907No. Civ. No. 347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The respondent, who is an architect, alleges that he was employed by appellant to prepare certain plans and specifications and receive estimates for, and superintend the erection of, a three-story hotel on the southwest corner of 9th street and Grand avenue, in the city of Los Angeles, of the estimated cost of $64,000; that the reasonable value of the services agreed to be performed by respondent for appellant was the sum of $2,560; that respondent entered upon said employment, prepared the necessary plans and specifications for said building, and received estimates for the erection thereof;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Brooks v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Carpenter v. ShinnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Snodgrass v.ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Greer v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. California Packers Co. v. Merritt Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. McKenzie v. Los Angeles Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Carr v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API