Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Shinners

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1895No. 19551PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from 'an order denying a new trial. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action to quiet the title of plaintiff to lots 1 and 2, in block 132, in the city of El Paso de Robles, county of San Luis Obispo, state of ■California.

The answer of defendant denied the allegations of the -complaint, and as a further defense to the action set up title in himself under a tax deed, a copy of which is attached to the answer.

Plaintiff failed to deny the genuineness and due execution of the tax deed by affidavit, as provided by section 448 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

At the trial it was admitted that plaintiff was the ■owner of the land described in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rollins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Burnett v. StearnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Harker v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. City of Napa v. EasterbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Sloan v. DigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API