Brooks v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County and from an order refusing a new trial. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action for the foreclosure of a mortgage. .The complaint is in the ordinary form, setting forth the promise sory note whose payment is secured by the mortgage, and alleging that it was made October 6, 1893, payable one year thereafter, and has not been paid. The complaint herein was filed September 1, 1896, and the defendant Johnson, one of the makers of the note, in his answer thereto, alleged that on the 19th of February, 1895, the plaintiff, by a written instrument, extended the time of payment of the note until the sixth day of October, 1896—setting forth in his answer a copy of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McGuire v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Colton Land & Water Co. v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Haight v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Ekel v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by29 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.