Legal Opinion

Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1952No. L. A. 22396PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The Sunset Milling and Grain Company sued to recover the amount of principal and interest due upon a series of nine promissory notes executed and delivered to it by O. E. Anderson, doing business as Anderson Feed Store. Its appeal from a judgment of nonsuit challenges the correctness of the trial court’s determination that an agreement pleaded by Anderson was a complete defense to the action.

By his answer, Anderson admitted the execution and delivery of the notes and alleged that they were made without consideration. The pleader then alleged the following facts:

Ralph Bangenter was field…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Golceff v. SugarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Garcia v. California Truck Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Buccery v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Sterling v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API