Legal Opinion
Hamburger v. Fry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 1958No. 37964PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
This appeal involves judgment vacation proceedings. The judgment was obtained by defendant in error, as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, in the sum of $3,419.20. This was the sum alleged, in plaintiff’s petition filed in August, 1956, to be due him, as a wholesale gasoline and oil dealer, for gas and oil he sold them for resale in a business said to be owned and operated by defendants, in Weatherford, Oklahoma, as “Hamburger Service.” Our'continued reference to the parties will be by their original trial court designations.
After being served with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Citizens' National Bank v. BrandenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Nash v. TreatMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Waterson v. Seat & CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1864
- Southwestern Surety Ins. v. TreadwayMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. H. Webb Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LobaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Burroughs v. Bob Martin CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Hart v. PharaohSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Crawford Ex Rel. Crawford v. GipsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.