Legal Opinion
Latson v. Eaton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 1957No. 37647PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
On May 3, 1956, defendants in error, husband and wife, obtained, as plaintiffs, a default judgment in the total sum of $36,900, against plaintiff in error, as defendant, in Comanche County Superior Court’s Cause No. S-1072. In the judgment’s journal entry filed on May 8th, thereafter, it was recited that: “The court first examined the summons in said action and finds that the defendant, James Latson, was personally served with summons * * * ”. On the 6th day thereafter, or May 11th, the named defendant, Latson, hereinafter referred to as movant, filed in said cause his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Nash v. TreatMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- First National Bank v. KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Morrell v. MorrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. H. Webb Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Burroughs v. Bob Martin CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Hamburger v. FrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Horowitz v. Alliance Home Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Branch v. Ameriresource Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.