In re the Personal Restraint of Erickson

¶1

In this personal restraint petition, Kail Erickson contends the Department of Corrections (DOC) failed to credit him for all “good time” to which he is legally entitled.1 He bases his claim on the sentencing court’s decision to credit him with “368 days served . . . solely for confinement” for convictions of second degree burglary and second degree possession of stolen property. He also contends that the procedure here violated his constitutional *580rights to due process, to equal protection, and to be free from double jeopardy.2

¶2 The jail certification at issue here correctly states the…