Legal Opinion

United States v. Pinero

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 14, 2003No. NMCM 200101373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge:

In accordance with mixed pleas, Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of unauthorized absence terminated by apprehension, multiple uses of methamphetamine, and multiple uses of marijuana, in violation of Articles 86 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 912a. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, reduction to pay grade E-l, and confinement for 72 days. The convening authority approved the findings and sentence. A pretrial agreement had no effect on the sentence.

We have carefully reviewed the record of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. FairclothCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. OuthierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PineroCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. RogersArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  3. United States v. ScottArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  4. United States v. PineroNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  5. United States v. Private E1 JUSTIN R. VEGAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API