Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Economu

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 14, 1976No. CM 434298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COOK, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, alleged as violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 928). He received the approved sentence set out above.

The first error noted in the appeal of this case involves the question of who may act as “counsel for the accused” in the performance of the post-trial duty instituted by the United States Court of Military Appeals in United States v. Goode, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 367, 50 C.M.R. 1, 1 M.J. 3 (1975).1

Captain David M. Uhler acted as appellant’s defense counsel throughout the pretrial and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. Cruz-RijosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. EasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. TellierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. FurgasonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. WallaceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. LohrmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. HahnU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API