Legal Opinion
MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 30, 2012No. Consol. 11-00209PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
This case returns to court following remand in MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United States, 36 CIT-, 853 F.Supp.2d 1336 (2012) ("MacLean-Fogg III ”). MacLearir-Fogg III found that the Department of Commerce’s (“the Department” or “Commerce”) application, to the Plaintiffs, of the all-others 374.15% countervailing duty (“CVD”) rate required reconsideration or further explanation because Commerce failed to properly explain why the assumption that Plaintiffs, like the mandatory respondents in this investigation, 2 used 100% of subsidies available throughout the People’s Republic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- MacLean-fogg Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United States, Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Snap-on, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.