Legal Opinion
Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 31, 2014No. Consol. 12-00007PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
This consolidated action returns to court, 2 following remand 3 and redetermi-nation 4 of the final results of the anti-dumping duty investigation of multilayered wood flooring from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). 5 Plaintiffs, cooperative non-investigated respondents who have established their entitlement to a separate antidumping duty rate, challenge the remand redetermination of that rate. 6 Plaintiffs argue that the Department of Commerce’s (“the Department” or “Commerce”) redetermination is flawed because the Department’s legal interpretations…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Vinh Hoan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo & Wood Indus. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.