Legal Opinion
Snap-on, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 16, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-150; Court 13-00238PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
In this action, Plaintiff, Snap-on, Inc. (“Snap-on”), a U.S. importer of goods containing aluminum extrusions manufactured in China, seeks an order enjoining the Department of Commerce from requiring, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection from collecting, 374.15% “all others” cash deposits and countervailing duties for Plaintiffs entries. Plaintiff contends that the “all others” rate applicable to its entries should be 137.65% (the “revised rate”) in accordance with this court’s judgment in MacLean-Fogg v. United States, 36 C.I.T. -, 885 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2012)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- CS Wind Vietnam Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016