Legal Opinion
Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 4, 2012No. Consol. 11-00209PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
In this action, Plaintiffs, four domestic importers and one exporter of extruded aluminum, challenge the all-others countervailing duty (“CVD”) rate set by the Department of Commerce (“the Department” or “Commerce”) in its investigation of their goods imported from the People’s Republic of China. We have jurisdiction under Section 516A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(B)(i) (2006) 1 and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c).
After a brief review of the relevant background and applicable standard of review, the court will explain why it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- MacLean-fogg Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.