Legal Opinion
MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 30, 2012No. Consol. 11-00209PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Chief Judge:
This case returns to the court following remand in Maclean-Fogg Co. v. United States, 36 CIT —, 836 F.Supp.2d 1367 (2012) (“Maclean-Fogg I ”). In Maclean-Fogg I, and again upon Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration in MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United States, 36 CIT —, 853 F.Supp.2d 1253 (2012) (“MacLean-Fogg II ”), the court found that the Department of Commerce’s (“the Department” or “Commerce”) calculation of the all-others 374.15% countervailing duty (“CVD”) rate, 2 based solely on mandatory respondents’ adverse facts available (“AFA”) rate, while legally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Gallant Ocean (Thailand) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Pam, S.P.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Jinan Yipin Corp. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MacLean-Fogg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- MacLean-fogg Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United States, Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Snap-on, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.