Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Kuntz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by Emil Kuntz and another against the Midland Savings & Loan Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
There is no dispute as to the facts in this case. The evidence discloses that defendant, the Midland Saving’s & Loan Company; is a building and loan association, duly incorporated under „the laws of Colorado, with its home office in Denver. On December 1, 1906, the plaintiff Emil Kuntz and one S. C. Rufty made application to and became members of the association by purchasing 25 shares of its stock, for which, on the same day, they received a certificate, and also made application for a loan of $700, which was granted, whereupon they assigned said stock to the association as collateral, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bedford v. Eastern Building and Loan Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Hieronymus v. New York Nat. Building & Loan Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1899
- Bennett v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Legg v. Midland Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. DeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Vincennes Bridge Co. v. Board of County Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Carter Oil Co. v. EliSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Cowley v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. NicollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.