Bennett v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 321, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., March T.r 1894, No. 536, onverdictfor defendant. Appeal from alderman. Assumpsit to recover money alleged to have been usuriously retained. Before Metzger, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court entered a compulsory nonsuit which it subsequently refused to take off. Error assigned was refusal to take off nonsuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Green,
The defendant is an incorporated building and loan association, duly incorporated by the laws of New York, and located and transacting business at Syracuse in that state. The plaintiff, in October, 1891, made application to become a member of the association by purchasing two shares of its stock, and in November following received a certificate for the shares. In *236May, 1892, he made application for a loan of $200 which was granted in December of the same year. As security for the loan he gave a bond and mortgage on some land in Lycoming county, Pennsylvania, for the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Manship v. New South Building & Loan Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi · 1901
- Healy v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- United States Savings & Loan Co. v. ShainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. KuntzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.