Legal Opinion
Cowley v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1947No. 3358PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
William C. Anderson and John C. Nichols were engaged in the flour milling business at Danville, Kentucky, under the trade name of Anderson & Spilman. S. L. Cowley was engaged at Hugo, Oklahoma, in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of a poisonous preparation designed to exterminate rats and mice. The product was marketed under a duly registered trademark. In 1939, the parties entered into a written contract which provided among other things that Anderson & Spilman should have a certain territory for the sale of the product, including Kentucky and other states; that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Cudahy Company v. American Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
- Koehring Company v. ED Etnyre & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- JA Apparel Corp. v. AbboudDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Speciner v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.